Kidney Dialysis Is a Booming Business. Is it Also a Rigged One?

0
47

Comments of the Day


15 December 2020






Video commentary for December 14th 2020




Eoin Treacy’s view


A link to today’s video commentary is posted in the Subscriber’s Area.

Some of the topics discussed include: stocks pause following initial vaccinations, waiting on additional stimulus, bitcoin and high growth stocks rally, gold and gold shares pause, oil steady, Dollar steadies against Renminbi.






Email of the day on yield to worst versus total return calculations


Dear Eoin. First of all, thank you for all the great work you do! In a recent email there was a quote that mentioned 10-year Treasuries would decline by 2/3 in value if rates go from 1% to 3%. This is not even close to the correct math. A $1000 bond today selling at a 1% semi-annual yield would be worth $828.31 should rates go to 3%. It is true that a 1% bond has greater convexity than a 4% bond but the differences are not nearly as material as the quote suggests. A 4% par bond moving to 6% would trade at $851.23 which is less than a 3% difference to the fall in value for the 1% bond. Hope this helps, (I disclose that I am an actuary :))




Eoin Treacy’s view


Thank you for this email which highlights an important consideration for bond investors. Your raw bond calculations gel with the bond calculators in Bloomberg I used to discuss the issue in the Big Picture Long-Term video.






Kidney Dialysis Is a Booming Business. Is it Also a Rigged One?


This article by Carrie Arnold for Undark may be of interest to subscribers. Here is a section:


The scheme, according to Wood and other critics, works something like this: Nearly everyone in the U.S. with end-stage renal disease is eligible for coverage by Medicare, even if they are under age 65. The federal program pays a fixed cost of about $240 per treatment. Patients receiving Medicare pay an annual deductible, after which they continue to be responsible for a 20 percent co-payment, or about $48, for each visit.


Patients with private insurance, however — including those with health benefits paid for by their employers — are a different story. Those insurance companies must negotiate payments with for-profit dialysis centers, and research has suggested that the centers have an edge in those negotiations — one they use to jack up prices. One research letter, published last year in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Internal Medicine, found that private insurers paid, on average, over $1,000 per treatment — roughly four times Medicare’s fixed costs.


One possible reason: More than 80 percent of dialysis patients receive their treatments from either DaVita or Fresenius Medical Care, which is headquartered in Germany, giving the two companies upwards of 80 percent of the $24.7 billion American dialysis market — and significant influence over the prices charged to private insurers. What’s more, both are widely known to donate hundreds of millions of dollars to the American Kidney Fund, covering the vast majority of the nonprofit’s budget. That’s a problem, according to Wood. With the help of the American Kidney Fund, after all, more patients are able to stay on private insurance longer, so both companies have an incentive to keep the AKF well-funded. More patients with private insurance means DaVita and Fresenius can bill much higher prices for their dialysis services — and pad their own bottom lines.


According to Wood, for every dollar DaVita or Fresenius donates to the American Kidney Fund, they get roughly $3.50 in return from private insurers. No wonder, then, that the two dialysis giants, which together earned about $2.2 billion in net income in 2019, reportedly donated $247 million to the nonprofit organization in 2018 — roughly 80 percent of the fund’s annual budget that year. (AKF’s own financial documents do not name the companies outright, instead referring to two unnamed corporations. When asked to confirm the identity of these donors, Tamara Ruggiero, a spokesperson for the organization, said the AKF was barred from doing so by rules established by the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services — ironically to “ensure that patients are not unduly influenced in their choice of dialysis providers.”)




Eoin Treacy’s view


This is but one example of how perverse the US healthcare system is. The reality of private health insurance is that there is no competition. The dance between for-profit insures with for-profit providers means that costs are greatly inflated relative to the rest of the world. The existence of vendor financing deals for patients is just another example of how difficult it is to ever reform the system.






Barnier’s Narrow Path: How a Brexit Deal Could Be Done This Week


This article by Ben Sills for Bloomberg may be of interest to subscribers. Here is a section:


Barnier said that if fishing rights can be settled, then the deal could come this week. But he warned that there’s also a risk the talks could drag on right up to the Dec. 31 deadline, and could eventually end in failure.


France’s junior minister for EU affairs, Clement Beaune, said he doesn’t think the negotiations should go beyond this week because it would leave too little time for dealing with the consequences — whether that’s ratification or a collapse.


People close to the British team had been talking about a deal as early as Tuesday to give the U.K. Parliament time to ratify the accord before it breaks up for the Christmas vacation. On Monday afternoon, however, an official said there had been no significant progress in recent days despite British efforts to invigorate the process.


What’s the latest mood?


“Obviously, no deal is a possible outcome,” Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s spokesman, Jamie Davies, told reporters on Monday. That marks a step back from Johnson’s warning on Thursday that a no-deal split was a “strong possibility.” But after a moment of optimism on Sunday, both sides are once again talking up the difficulties ahead.




Eoin Treacy’s view


When politicians talk about the possibility of a no-deal it has generally meant they are actively negotiating. When they seem confident of a deal, the market tends to be more willing to support a higher price value for the Pound versus the Euro.












This is your daily comment from www.fullertreacymoney.com.

Subscribe to Fuller Treacy Money Limited for exclusive content and audio: Click here for details.




The information provided on this website (www.fullertreacymoney.com) is for the purposes of information only. This website and its content is not and should not be considered or deemed to be an offer of or invitation to engage in any investment activity. Nothing Fuller Treacy Money does and nothing on this website is intended to operate or be construed as the giving of advice or the making of a recommendation by Fuller Treacy Money to any investor or prospective investor. Fuller Treacy Money and any other group or associated company of it is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK or any other regulatory body in any other jurisdiction. By means of your login to our service you are deemed to thereby accept our current Terms of Business including this notice, Except for permission to download a single copy for personal use, the research published by Fuller Treacy Money may not be reproduced, distributed or published in whole or in part by any recipient for any purpose, without the prior express consent of Fuller Treacy Money. Information featured on the website is based upon information and data provided by Fuller Treacy Money and remains the intellectual property of Fuller Treacy Money. Some of the information may also be provided by third parties and whilst Fuller Treacy Money will seek to ensure that information featured the website is updated on a regular basis, Fuller Treacy Money does not accept any responsibility for, and disclaims any and all liability for, any such information (including the accuracy of such information) or views or opinions expressed on the website. Any person considering an investment opportunity as a result of data presented on the website should give full regard to all the content of the website, and should perform their own due diligence and obtain advice from suitably qualified professional advisers before investing. Prospective investors are also encouraged and recommended to take their own independent legal and taxation advice together with any other advice that they may consider necessary to consider the benefits and risks attached to any investment opportunity. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is or will be made or given by Fuller Treacy Money (including its executives, employees, agents, contractors and advisors) in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of the website, save that any such liability is not excluded in respect of fraudulent misrepresentation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here